drift Line april 2022 an exchange about DH Lawrence and Apocalypse

[sylviajenepi]

Hi.
I received this interfax message from Sylvia today. She is trying to
reshape the Christian God Bible . it was modified by the Vatican and the
Romans.
Did anyone else here has read « Apocalypse » the book Lawrence wrote in
1929 and which has been studied by deleuze in CC?


Interfax Meme 2d of April 2022

Revelation 18:23. (Image of two DNA strands)

<<And the light of a candle shall shine no more in thee; and the voice of
the bridegroom and of the bride shall be heard no more at all in thee: for
thy merchants were the great men of the Earth; for by pharmakeia were all
men deceived>>


Justine:<<Holy moly ... Pharmakeia is Greek for Sorcery ... and this is
actually in the bible
https://www.bibleref.com/Revelation/18/ ... 18-23.html>>



Sylvia:<<well « your merchants magic spell » is translated by the white
hats meme fabric as « pharmakeia ». The good idea would be the white hats
to give up quoting revelation which is non christian.. non Jesus just a
magic spell, ironically.. a magic spell against the World !! not Jesus the
world was created by his father no? so, even if theres salt and peper you
dont throw the baby with the bath water (frenchy expression i learned)


why is saying humanity has been « under magic spell of the Merchants » not
a religious statement but a polemic politician tribunal ?

Because it makes your programmed to your soul.

Your soul is learning the beauty of Jesus message.

Then we put at the end of both Testaments « revelation » which makes you
hate the part of the money given to Caesar.

Ok.

But then you are compelled to live, unless you live from the songs of birds
as anachoretes like St Francis of Assise.

You denigrate thus with your soul and aspect of you of your life in this
world.

You therefore are led to mistrust many things in the world.

It impoverishes you soul.

And unbalances this World beauty to the next which we call « New
Jerusalem », and which is now called NWO


(i am not sure if i am clear enough)>>

[sylviajenepi]

Dr Wen. from driftline in answer to Johnatan Petterson:

Hello,

I onlyread th articles (crticabsd clinic).

why is saying humanity has been « under magic spell of the Merchants » not,
This goes back to #Spinza, who statdthat
"money has become thr nwasure ofeverything" in EIVCP "so that musz OCCOPY the imagibnationof the
masses MOSTLY"

TH TTP of SPinza is a verygoogdsouec fore vbible crtcs at all.thre ressonfoe dEleuze ticite Lawrencve, prbably.

It hasdbena CONPLATIONof th BEW THEATMENTS by th ROMANEMPOERERT andchurch cradnals,
whre anECAGRELIUMof PETRUS!!! wsdrULEDF out.

BUT th argumennt ibnth e crticand ckinicartcle is,
realtes to th psychligical anlases byNIetzschofJesus
inAnticvhrist,
that JIhannesevagliumapocalypse isfULL OF REVENGE of t masses asndwilto revoltion,
whil inth other the isa INTECTAKSRCIDEAL of Jesus himself,


Am 02.04.22 um 15:41 schrieb Johnatan Petterson:
> why is saying humanity has been « under magic spell of the Merchants » not

[sylviajenepi]

Ho glad someone finally answers i had some worry everybody had been
disconnected by time or something.

weird how google translates most of your computer mispellings back into
human rule.

what i wanted to make sure is to have read:
« It had been a compilation of the testaments by the roman empire and the
church cardinals, where an evangelion of Petrus !!! has been ruled out »

can you just answer by y or n : y if yes thats what you intended to write
or n if thats not the case. a correction might be helping us, if needed.

(i fully understand that you didn’t repair your computer since 2006 and i
am sure no one to blame anyone for being neglecting hardwares or softwares.
i also am aware alas, there are a lot of viruses since Bill Gates built a
flaw, a bit like in Rogue One, especially on PC. use a mac might help but
its expensive so thats ok. )

now..
« taking into consideration the psychological analysis » might you say it
be apt to describe « realtes to th psychligal analysis »?

yes i havn t read F.Nietzsche’s « antichrist » since 1995 i think . he
portrayed Jesus of Beitlehem as a self sufficient, poetic yet naive, and
young mind, this coming to us in the metaphysical aristocratic cavalry
hindsight meaningfullness that Nietzsche could be sometimes be loading his
palabras, from within themselves.

someone else « pretzel » reminded us here of Nietzsche psychological
skills in descriptions of Jesus and Socrates in a double one to the other,
but in a negative way?
in the progress towards the free will of each individuality?
in Birth of Tragedy but i have not read this one either, even if its the
favorite. I listen to Bizet a lot nowadays. Carmen.


<<INTECTAKSRCIDEAL>> this words makes me think of Kafka s metamorphosis.
CC speaks of the necessity to a fight « la lutte ».

the mob does not fight.

revenge is not a problem, or is it?

the mob spirit is like Noahs flood.
the rainbow was set by G in the clouds, he promised Noah.

Do you know of Nimrod, prof. Harald Wenk?

Nimrod is the son of Koush. He is a hunter.

« according to the Sages, Nimrod was the primary force behind this
rebellion. The _Midrashim_ explain his sinister motive. He planned to build
a tower ascending to Heaven and, from it, wage war against G. » a note from
the stone edition of the Tanakh (Hebrew-English Bible) . see Genesis 11:1-9


How could the Apocalypse of John be the « intact source ideal » (?) of
Jesus himself, according to you?

Thank you and a great enjoyment in reading you,

Best,

Johnattan Peterson